[Beowulf] g77 limits...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comWed Feb 22 16:18:33 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Next message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 05:45:06PM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote: > these days, gcc does pretty well compared to commercial compilers, if you > take care to -march, -msse2 and other tweaks. I can't see why this > pretty respectable code quality for c/c++/etc wouldn't also apply to > fortran. even the ada and java people seem to be almost happy with > gcc's code-gen... Er, it depends. gcc is a pretty good compiler for integer, but it's way behind the curve for numerical code and peak options. For Fortran, there's also the issue that performance-sensitive use of intrinsics really needs them expanded and optimized in-line. I don't know if g95 or gfortran have implemented these yet, but I do see people showing relatively poor performance for those cases. -- greg (disclaimer: we sell compilers, but then again, we compare against gcc in a regular basis...)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Next message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
