[Beowulf] g77 limits...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caWed Feb 22 14:45:06 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Next message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > > archives because it is so time dependent an answer. In particular, can > > > an x64 box with a modern linux kernel and a modern g77 allocate 4-8 GB > > > > isn't "modern g77" a bit of an oxymoron? > > (given the existence of gfortran, I mean). > > Oh, I was totally confused by the combination "g77" and "allocate". > > Robert, try g95. Although it is not part of the gnu stream but > it seems more stable at the moment. It works stand alone. why g95? gfortran _is_ part of the normal GCC stream, and 4.02 seems fairly mature (4.1 is about to come out). > However in terms of performance you may lose considerably > compared to commercial compilers. these days, gcc does pretty well compared to commercial compilers, if you take care to -march, -msse2 and other tweaks. I can't see why this pretty respectable code quality for c/c++/etc wouldn't also apply to fortran. even the ada and java people seem to be almost happy with gcc's code-gen...
- Previous message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Next message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
