[Beowulf] What did I neglect to add? Specing hardware and software and support for a 16 node beowulf
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns john.hearns at streamline-computing.comThu Feb 16 02:03:39 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What did I neglect to add? Specing hardware and software and support for a 16 node beowulf
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nas parallel benchmarks issue
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 17:36 -0800, Dan Stromberg wrote: > I've spent the afternoon brainstorming about things to ask vendors as we > evaluating their responses to our RFP and refine what we spec. > > Did I leave out anything that might come back and bite me later? > > http://dcs.nac.uci.edu/~strombrg/beowulf-evaluation/ > I would add a question on factory burn-in tests. Re. the compilers, you should have the input here. You can get evaluation versions of compilers to try out, and specify the one you want, the one which works best with your code. We ship with eval versions of different compilers, and will talk with you about the best choice. Sorry if I'm labouring the point, but it seems a little that you are asking what the vendor supplies. In regard to software, you can have influence over the choices.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What did I neglect to add? Specing hardware and software and support for a 16 node beowulf
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nas parallel benchmarks issue
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
