[Beowulf] Fwd: NIS limitations question
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caThu Feb 9 15:37:24 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Fwd: NIS limitations question
- Next message: [Beowulf] Fwd: NIS limitations question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > I have deep admiration for DNS, and quite a lot of scorn for > > various other systems that try to do similar things, poorly. > > for instance, LDAP works, but that's the best you can say for it. > > imagine if the LDAP folk had thought of how to use DNS as a > > directory infrastructure (but alas, they were x500 recidivists ;) > > LOL. > > I'll take LDAP over Hesiod for almost anything. I didn't say hesiod - as far as I can tell, it's main problem was kerberization. I can't see why storing account info in DNS has to become a morass... > But everyone has a right to their opinion. :) well, how about some facts? what was bad about Hesiod?
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Fwd: NIS limitations question
- Next message: [Beowulf] Fwd: NIS limitations question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
