[Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Kurtzer gmk at runlevelzero.netWed Dec 13 19:04:29 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:44 PM, Eric Shook wrote: > Thank you for commenting on this Greg. I might look deeper into > perceus as an option if rhel (and particularly variants as in > Scientific Linux) work well. Yes, we already have Centos and Caos 2&3 base images that most people are using for testing. > Our infrastructure will most likely include nfs-root, possibly > hybrid and full-install. So if Perceus can support it with a few > simple VNFS capsules then that should simplify administration greatly. These should be coming very soon. :) > > Would you declare Perceus as production quality? Or would our > production infrastructure be a large-scale test? (Which I'm not > sure if I'm comfortable being a test case with our production > clusters ;o) It depends on when you are ready to migrate. Our first test system was a 512 node Inifiband cluster and it worked without incident. We also have several other large prospects on the horizon (including vendor partnerships) so production readiness won't be a problem. With that said, I would wait until I do the formal press release (waiting for the 1.0 tree to finish getting hammered out by our testers and initial users). Thanks for inquiring! -- Greg Kurtzer gmk at runlevelzero.net
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
