[Beowulf] distributed file storage solution?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Michael Huntingdon hunting at ix.netcom.comMon Dec 11 22:32:09 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] distributed file storage solution?
- Next message: [Beowulf] distributed file storage solution?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I just sat in on a presentation where both streaming and meta-data were discussed. Meta-data is the silver bullet in a Luster environment. The conversation turned to setting up NFS for home/user, with the nearly all other data on SFS with enough OSS and MDS servers to provide both the throughput and failover needed. regards michael At 07:57 PM 12/11/2006, Brian D. Ropers-Huilman wrote: >On 12/11/06, Craig Tierney <ctierney at hypermall.net> wrote: >>Lustre supports redundant meta-data servers (MDS) and failover for the >>object-storage servers (OSS). However, "high-performing" is relative. >>Great at streaming data, not at meta-data. > >Which is really the bane of all cluster file systems, isn't it? Meta >data accesses kill performance. > >-- >Brian D. Ropers-Huilman >_______________________________________________ >Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit >http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] distributed file storage solution?
- Next message: [Beowulf] distributed file storage solution?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
