[Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Buccaneer for Hire. buccaneer at rocketmail.comSat Dec 9 19:44:01 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> no, I really meant to put one admin server (1u is fine) in each rack. > I'd already have a Gb switch and possibly a high-speed interconnect > leaf in the rack if possible. a modular approach like this cuts > down on cabling and out-of-rack traffic. No place to put it in the rack. these are blades. But they do have 3 Cisco bricks with their own private pathway between them so I can connect each server to a local switch. > if your logs are enough to interfere with other traffic, something's wrong. > but perhaps you don't look at your logs as much as I do (which is why > I want them coalesced.) Too many nodes and not enough time, and I mostly manage by exception. If it is running well I don't want to have to keep an eye on it. We have a daemon that collects information on each node and keeps an eye on the local log file. Then we have capture the serial console into a log file. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
