Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] 'liquid cooled' racks

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Bruce Allen ballen at gravity.phys.uwm.edu
Mon Dec 4 11:29:04 PST 2006


Hi Mark,

>> For my next cluster room, I am hoping to use 'liquid cooled' racks make by 
>> Knurr (CoolTherm, http://www.thermalmanagement.de/).  The scale is 67 racks 
>> x 7.5kW heat removal per rack (36 U usable per rack).
>
> 7.5 KW/rack isn't much; are you designing low-power nodes?

Yup -- I guess so.  For example our current cluster nodes are dual core 
Opteron 175s (Supermicro H8SSL-i motherboards).  They cost about $1200 for 
2 x 2.2 GHz, with 1GB per core, and use 180 W under load (per 1U).

I will have enough rack space (67 x 34 U, per 500kW power and cooling) 
that if I want to use nodes that dissipate 300 W per node then I will 
simply limit myself to 25 nodes per rack.

>> The racks have front and back doors that close, and contains fans in the 
>> back which circulate air through a heat exchanger located in the bottom of 
>> the rack.  The heat exchanger transfers the heat into chilled water.
>
> APC has something similar with the cooling on the side.

Can you give a positive or negative opinion about either the Knurr or APC 
racks?  Have you used them yourself in a system?

>> The advantages of this are that it is quiet, and that you don't need 
>> vertical height for underfloor ducting or overhead hot air removal. 
>> Disadvantages are cost, potential difficulty of working within the rack. 
>> and loss of one rack of cooling capacity if you open both the front and 
>> back doors.
>
> I'm pretty skeptical of the sealed-pod approach, since it seems to 
> multiply the number of parts, create access issues, doesn't seem to 
> actually save on space, etc.

It does save on vertical space, and it reduces noise to the level where 
you can work comfortably in the room.

> I've also been burned by cold water cooling, so to speak (assuming you 
> don't have your own, well-controlled CW plant.)

I'll have my own self-contained plant, designed by German engineers.  They 
seem to know their stuff.

> I would definitely consider a normal big-chillers approach _with_
> back-of-rack CW boosters (heat exchangers).

Can you provide a URL or recommendation for these back-of-rack CW 
boosters?

> and I'd definitely consider creative layouts of racks and chillers (for 
> instance, I'm not crazy about the hot/cold-aisle approach - something 
> W-shaped would be better for my ~50-rack machineroom.  or even just 
> lining all the hot racks up against the chillers along one wall.)
>
>> (In this case I have access to 'building' funds that can not be used to buy 
>> more cpus, so the cost issue is not important.)
>
> are you sure you can't just be clever about laying out normal front-to-back 
> racks?  possibly with back-of-rack heat-exchangers?

I'd like a URL for the back-of-rack heat exchangers, please!

(PS: though that approach still sounds noisy!)

Cheers,
 	Bruce



More information about the Beowulf mailing list