[Beowulf] Which is better: 32x2 or 64x1
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bruce Allen ballen at gravity.phys.uwm.eduFri Apr 28 07:49:44 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Which is better: 32x2 or 64x1
- Next message: [Beowulf] Which is better: 32x2 or 64x1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
For what it's worth, the Opteron 175 (2 x 2.2 GHz cores) is identical silicon to the AMD64 x2 4400+. The qualification/testing process is apparently NOT the same for the two types of chip, and the register that returns 'chip ID' is programmed differently. Other than that, I have been told by AMD engineers that they are identical. Cheers, Bruce On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Leon Matthews wrote: >>> Now I want to know which is better (performance & price)? >>> * 64 x Opteron Single Core >>> * 32 x Opteron Dual Core > > How does the performance of Dual Core Opterons compare to that of Dual Core > Athlon64 processors? > > It is /much/ cheaper (30- 50% -- at least down here in the antipodes) to > build a system with the later, especially when you take into account the > price of the motherboards. > > Cheers, > > Leon > > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Which is better: 32x2 or 64x1
- Next message: [Beowulf] Which is better: 32x2 or 64x1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
