[Beowulf] 3d rendering cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rayson Ho raysonlogin at gmail.comMon May 23 10:02:48 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 3d rendering cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] 3d rendering cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The big irons are better in terms of admin cost I guess... Imagine you only need to look at 1 box with hundreds of processors instead of 50 or so dual -CPU boxes to manage! However, the cost of the huge SMP boxes is so expensive that you consider to use other ways to get around the administrator overhead, like using the "Rocks cluster" package. Also, use a distributed batch system like Gridengine to manage the rendering jobs. What you really need is a compute farm, instead of the traditional supercomputer type of cluster. http://www.rocksclusters.org/Rocks/ http://gridengine.sunsource.net/ And the IA64/Itanic processors are slower than the AMD processors when running real code, and AMD servers are less expensive :) Rayson On 5/23/05, Paul K Egell-Johnsen <paul.k.egell.johnsen at gmail.com> wrote: > Furthermore, but this is off topic I guess, would a larger iron from > SGI or SUN be better than a cluster for this kind of use (though we'd > be loosing sound fx and AfterFX processing)? >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 3d rendering cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] 3d rendering cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
