[Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduThu May 5 12:00:24 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Jim Lux wrote: > >with the chickens the same money would buy. Not to mention the risk of > >mad oxen disease... > > would that not be "Mad Ox Disease"? <grin> But Avian flu is much more > contagious than Max Ox, so it might wipe out your flock. Perhaps 5%-10% .... > have to do on occasion) is tedious and slow. Why can't we all just program > little Rabbit Semiconductor superZ80's running uCOS? > (http://www.rabbitsemiconductor.com/) Sheesh, first Oxen, then chickens (which should really have been penguins as was recently pointed out to me by JH), and now rabbits? Good model, though -- we know how fast THEY multiply. Besides, as Mark pointed out the traditional metaphor is cars. Now I'm going to go tend my muttons before everybody reading this thread runs like lemmings into the sea. rgb -- Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
