[Beowulf] First 96-Node Transmeta Desktop Cluster Ships
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux jimlux at earthlink.netThu May 5 07:10:08 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] First 96-Node Transmeta Desktop Cluster Ships
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Piskorski" <atp at piskorski.com> To: <Beowulf at beowulf.org> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 4:18 AM Subject: Re: [Beowulf] First 96-Node Transmeta Desktop Cluster Ships > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 12:35:14AM +0200, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > > > Please note that nowadays your salaries for programmers, world wide seen, > > are not true at all. > > If I recall correctly, the example given was a "structural analyst" > costing an employer 250k USD/year; he said nothing specific about > programmers, or software. This is a reasonable example. There are > many, many highly skilled workers in different niches (including > programmers) around the world who cost their employers easily that, > sometimes much, much more (think Wall Street traders.) Note well, also, that the $250K/yr corresponds to the "fully burdened cost" of a $100k/yr salaried employee. Adding in taxes, infrastructure, benefits, some fraction of that employee's manager, profit, etc. costs. Bicker all you want about whether burden should be 50%, or 100% or 150%, the general arguments remain the same. Just to set a context though, strictly benefits and taxes runs about 50-60% in most companies. (13% for FICA, for instance)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] First 96-Node Transmeta Desktop Cluster Ships
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
