[Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns john.hearns at streamline-computing.comThu Jun 16 00:13:06 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
- Next message: [Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 12:47 -0400, Suvendra Nath Dutta wrote: > I guess I could update the kernel. Its certainly not automated, but > updating by hand is fairly simple. I have also considered adding 2 more > GB memory to the head node. Maybe that is a cheaper solution than > buying a different machine. Also is it possible to have a redundant > head node? It sounds impossible, or is it possible? Yes, it is possible to have a redundant head node, using Linux High Availabilty. However, you should get this NFS sorted out first!
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
- Next message: [Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list