[Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comWed Jun 15 09:27:01 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
- Next message: [Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Suvendra: Suvendra Nath Dutta wrote: > We set up a 160 node cluster with a dual processor head node with 2GB > RAM. The head node also has two RAID devices attached to two SCSI cards. > These have a XFS filesystem on them and are NFS exported to the cluster. > The head node runs very low on memory (7-8 MB). And today I ran into a > kernel bug that crashed the system. Google suggests that I should > upgrade to kernel 2.6.11, but that sounds very unpleasant. I am thinking > of putting the raid boxes on a different box. Will separating the > file-server and the head node give me back stability on the head node? What distribution are you using today? Which kernel? what does your uasge pattern look like on the head node and on the file server? Joe > > Suvendra. > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
- Next message: [Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
