[Beowulf] mobos/chipsets for small Athlon64-based cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mikhail Kuzminsky kus at free.netTue Jun 14 11:06:38 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: [PVFS2-users] new mpich/pvfs2
- Next message: [Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I need to build very small and cheap Athlon64 (not FX)-based (i.e. w/single CPU nodes) GiGE cluster. The processors planned are Athlon64 3200+ Socket939 w/1 Gbyte/s "bus". The problem is in preferred Linux x86-64 versions: only SuSE 9.0 and 9.1 are officially "available" for some binary application. Of course, we need only minimal graphics; SATA drives are not necessary. The choice is 1st of all between chipsets; for mobos available on market (as I understand) there is nVidia nForce3 (nForce 4 has "more high requirements to the kernel", I beleive) and VIA K8T800 Pro. The mobos analyzed are MSI K8N Neo2(nForce 3) or Gigabyte (like GA-K8V Ultra939 w/VIA chipset). The question is about support of this chipsets for SuSE 9.0/9.1 kernels (i.e. for 2.4.21 - SuSE 9.0 or 2.6.x for SuSE 9.1). Formally I have no needs to have support of all the chipset features (see above). But nVidia wrote, for example, that kernel 2.4.21 is "too old" for nForce3 (IDE will not work), it's necessary minimum 2.4.23, so the standard SuSE 9.0 installation (if I'm correct) simple will not work. So I'll be very appreciate in any information about possible "SuSE kernels" for the chipsets I said above. Yours Mikhail Kuzminsky Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry Moscow
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: [PVFS2-users] new mpich/pvfs2
- Next message: [Beowulf] NFS+XFS+SMP on kernel 2.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
