[Beowulf] [rjdyer@vcu.edu: Re: Intel?]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Toon Moene toon at moene.indiv.nluug.nlWed Jun 8 12:48:24 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Switching
- Next message: [Beowulf] [rjdyer@vcu.edu: Re: Intel?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: > GCC now seems to have reasonably nice support for vector operations, > on top of the intrinsics, and even some auto-vectorization. any > preliminary reports of experience with gcc 4? We, i.e. GCC (not me personally) tried very hard to get target-independent vector support into GCC (so hard that the first implementation by Red Hat got (mostly) rejected). This effort now pays of, because it's much easier to implement autovectorization when your model of vectors is target-independent. That said, GCC 4.0.x will only have limited autovectorization support (if there's interest, I could summarize the limitations). Cheers, -- Toon Moene - e-mail: toon at moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/ Looking for a job: Work from home or at a customer site; HPC, (GNU) Fortran & C
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Switching
- Next message: [Beowulf] [rjdyer@vcu.edu: Re: Intel?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
