[Beowulf] Clos networking and myrinet
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comWed Jun 8 12:57:21 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Clos networking and myrinet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Clos networking and myrinet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Greg, Greg Lindahl wrote: >>>In a Linux cluster, each node talks to multiple other nodes. So they >>>always interfere with each other. > > >>Sorry, why is it right ? >>- for typical example, if I have a pair of nodes w/MPI_Send one 1st >>and MPI_Recv on second ? > Seriously, as I said, if you only have each node talking to one other > node, then the statement about Clos networks being non-blocking is > true. But this is not typical for Linux clusters. I think it's typical to have several nodes talking to several *other* nodes, and that's fine with route dispersion. However, it's not typical to have several nodes talking to the *same node at the same time*. If it happens, the application may not have the choice and it's doomed, or it's poorly written and it will always suck. Patrick -- Patrick Geoffray Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Clos networking and myrinet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Clos networking and myrinet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
