[Beowulf] [craig.hunter@nasa.gov: Re: Intel?]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Michael T. Prinkey mprinkey at aeolusresearch.comWed Jun 8 10:02:21 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] [craig.hunter@nasa.gov: Re: Intel?]
- Next message: [Beowulf] [craig.hunter@nasa.gov: Re: Intel?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Robert G. Brown wrote: > > This just makes it official. Apple will from now on be in direct > competition with Microsoft, unless they are completely daft and make > enough architectural changes in x86 that their software isn't portable > to vanilla box PCs. > It seems that they are "daft." One Apple's VPs has emphatically declared that they will not allow MAC OSX to run on anything but Apply hardware. They were bit by the clone business once. They seem reluctant to do it again. Too bad too. That is one of the few possibilities for a real tidal change in the desktop. Mike
- Previous message: [Beowulf] [craig.hunter@nasa.gov: Re: Intel?]
- Next message: [Beowulf] [craig.hunter@nasa.gov: Re: Intel?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
