[Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mikhail Kuzminsky kus at free.netFri Jul 29 10:34:47 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In message from Joe Landman <landman at scalableinformatics.com> (Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:25:35 -0400): >Hi Philippe: > > I don't have an accurate measurement at this moment. I have been >working on measurement using the performance counters. > > What I did not run, but would like to see is a set of streams >numbers >per core, for 1,2,3,4 on the system. I performed like tests: for 2p/4c Opteron 275 w/DDR333, w/Linux 2.4.21 SMP kernel. The results for different compilers (ifort, pgf77, pathf90) said the same: scaling of memory throughput from 1 to 2 cores is much more worse, than for single core Opteron 242; "scaling" from 2 cores to 4 cores of dual Opteron 275 server gives *decrease* of throughput. It looks that w/o (NUMA+CPU affinity) the results are bad. This results w/some other tests, including computational chemistry benchmarks will be soon published in russian "Open Systems" journal, but they will be on russian :-) Yours Mikhail > >Joe > >Philippe Blaise wrote: >> Hopefully, you show that dual core is quite superior to >> "hyper"-threading for some scientific programs, >> and is cost-friendly, very nice ! but page 14 you write >> >> "It is worth noting that since AMBER8 does consume significant >>memory >> bandwidth, the >> memory contention issue that could reduce overall performance on a >>AMD >> Opteron 275 >> processor based 2p/4c system under heavy memory usage shows a small >> effect, at most". >> >> Please, what do you mean by "significant memory bandwith" ? may be >>no >> more than 50 % ? >> have you got an estimation value ? >> >> Philippe. >> >> Joe Landman wrote: >> >>> Hi Steve: >>> >>> Not knowing the details of your calculations might be an issue, >>>but >>> you can read about our experiences with a number of chemistry and >>> informatics codes on dual core Opteron systems. See >>> http://enterprise2.amd.com/downloadables/Dual_Core_Performance.pdf >>>for >>> more details. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> Steve Cousins wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:25:12 +0100 Igor Kozin wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> But now for 4cores/2CPUs per Opteron node to force the using of >>>>> >>>>>> only 2 cores (from 4), by 1 for each chip, we'll need to have >>>>>> cpu affinity support in Linux. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mikhail, >>>>> you can use "taskset" for that purpose. For example, (perhaps not in >>>>> the most elegant form) >>>>> mpiexec -n 1 taskset -c 0 $code : -n 1 taskset -c 2 $code >>>>> But I doubt you want to let the idle cores to do something else in >>>>> the mean time. However small you will generally see an increase in >>>>> performance if you use all the cores. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We are considering getting a Dual Dual-Core Opteron system vs. two >>>>Dual >>>> Opteron systems. We like the ability to use all four cores on one >>>>model >>>> but a lot of what we'll do is have two models running at the same >>>>time, >>>> each using two cores. We are worried that running two models on one >>>> system with four cores (each >>>> model using two cores) will not work as well as using two systems, >>>>each >>>> with two cores/cpu's. Is this what you were refering to (Igor) when >>>>you >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> But I doubt you want to let the idle cores to do something else >>>>> in the mean time. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We have an 8 CPU SGI Origin 3200 that has no problem doing this sort >>>>of >>>> thing. I'm just curious what the implications are of doing this >>>>with >>>> the >>>> Dual Core Opteron cpu's. Thanks, >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>> Steve Cousins, Ocean Modeling Group Email: >>>>cousins at umit.maine.edu >>>> Marine Sciences, 208 Libby Hall >>>> http://rocky.umeoce.maine.edu >>>> Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469 Phone: (207) 581-4302 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >>>> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit >>>> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >>> >>> >>> > >-- >Joseph Landman, Ph.D >Founder and CEO >Scalable Informatics LLC, >email: landman at scalableinformatics.com >web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com >phone: +1 734 786 8423 >fax : +1 734 786 8452 >cell : +1 734 612 4615 > >_______________________________________________ >Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit >http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
