[Beowulf] Re: dual core (latency)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comMon Jul 18 22:31:34 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: dual core (latency)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: dual core (latency)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 06:42:02AM +0200, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > You keep mixing latency and bandwidth. That's ugly, to say polite. Vincent, If you're through berating Stuart, can you be bothered to explain why you think TLB misses should be so cheap? Many architectures have much worse TLB miss performance than the Opteron. Go bother the Power5 newsgroup. -- g
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: dual core (latency)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: dual core (latency)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list