[Beowulf] Re: dual core Opteron performance - re suse 9.3
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Bowen jbowen at hpcsystems.comWed Jul 13 08:33:53 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: dual core Opteron performance - re suse 9.3
- Next message: [Beowulf] SuSE 9.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 08:37 -0400, Joe Landman wrote: > Hi John: > > We find that we are talking about "per core" to our customers now. I > explain that previously, there has been an implicit 1-to-1 mapping > between processor cores and chips, so that you could talk about either > one and mean the other. Now however, we are talking about per core, as > things like licensing (lmgrd) aren't going to count chips or sockets, > but will count cores. > Unfortunately it isn't going to be that straightforward ... some vendors are going to go by sockets/chips (Microsoft, Red Hat) and others by cores (your example of lmgrd and I believe Oracle). Confusion will abound. Oh well. -- Jim Bowen Dir. Systems Engineering HPC Systems, Inc. http://www.hpcsystems.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: dual core Opteron performance - re suse 9.3
- Next message: [Beowulf] SuSE 9.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
