[Beowulf] SuSE 9.3
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govWed Jul 13 10:29:04 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 17, Issue 17
- Next message: was OT -> Re: [Beowulf] SuSE 9.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 07:23 AM 7/13/2005, Lombard, David N wrote: >From: Mark Hahn on Tuesday, July 12, 2005 5:27 PM > > > > > Corporate users and ISVs don't want to see the OS revised more than >once > > > a year. > > > > which is sad, really. they've been so traumatized by the dominant > > platform that they expect that changing anything will break >everything. > > the very concept of a standard, let alone an interface standard (ABI) > > is foreign to this mentality. Aside from compatibility issues, there's a not-insignificant cost to rolling out a change to thousands of desktops, some small fraction of which WILL break for one reason or another, no matter what OS you're running. Say you're a corporate IT manager responsible for 10,000 desktop machines. If 0.1% of those machines break (which is a very small number), you've got to handle 10 calls, each of which probably costs you somewhere between $500-1000 (staff to handle it, the lost productivity of the person who's machine broke, etc.). Say you roll out the change in the daytime.. there's going to be some disruption of what's going on with each desktop. Say it costs 15 minutes for each user.. times 10,000 users, that's 2500 work hours, conservatively well over $100K worth. Assuming all goes well. If some fraction of those users decide to call the help line because "something weird is going on with my PC", you've just radically increased the cost of the roll out. So, you say, roll it out at night. Then, some fairly significant fraction of the machines won't get the update because the user has turned it off (despite broadcast messages and exhortations to "please leave your computer on tonight"). This is more a manifestation of having thousands of machines in the hands of unsophisticated users, than any particular OS choice. By the way, sophisticated users are actually worse: They notice that something weird is going on and call to ask; They're more likely to have changed the "default configuration" of the system; They're more likely to have installed some other software, outside the official configuration management regime. So, moderate to big shops tend to want to avoid willy-nilly rearrangement of the computing configuration. Once a year is nice.. You budget $500K or so for the rollout and its costs (pretesting, support, organization, etc.) and you're done with it. James Lux, P.E. Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group Flight Communications Systems Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena CA 91109 tel: (818)354-2075 fax: (818)393-6875
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 17, Issue 17
- Next message: was OT -> Re: [Beowulf] SuSE 9.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
