[Beowulf] real hard drive failures
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caTue Jan 25 14:26:36 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] real hard drive failures
- Next message: [Beowulf] real hard drive failures
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > I'm only partially interested in the thread "Cooling vs HW replacement" but > > the problem with drive failures is a real pain for me. So, I thought I'd > > share some of my experience. > > i'd add 1 or 2 cooling fans per ide disk, esp if its 7200rpm or 10,000 rpm > disks I'm pretty dubious of this: adding two 50Khour moving parts to improve the airflow around a 1Mhour moving part which only dissipates 10W in the first place? designing the chassis for proper airflow with minimum fanage is obviously smarter and probably safer. > - if downtime is important, and should be avoidable, than raid > is the worst thing, since it's 4x slower to bring back up than > a single disk failure eh? you have a raid which is not operational while rebuilding? > - raid will NOT prevent your downtime, as that raid box > will have to be shutdown sooner or later > ( shutting down sooner ( asap ) prevents data loss ) huh? hotspares+hotplug=zero downtime. but yes, treating whole servers as your hotspare+hotplug element is a nice optimization, since hotplug ethernet is pretty cheap vs $50 hotplug caddies for each and every disk ;)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] real hard drive failures
- Next message: [Beowulf] real hard drive failures
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
