[Beowulf] Cooling vs HW replacement
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Karen Shaeffer shaeffer at neuralscape.comTue Jan 18 10:59:30 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cooling vs HW replacement
- Next message: another radical concept...Re: [Beowulf] Cooling vs HW replacement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:30:03AM -0700, Josip Loncaric wrote: > At my old job, we had the unfortunate experience of AC failing on the > hottest days of the year. Despite providing plenty of circulating fresh > 35-40 deg. C air, we lost hardware, mainly disks. In fact, we'd start > losing hard drives (even high quality SCSI drives in our servers) any > time the ambient temperature approached 30 deg. C. Hello, I would certainly agree with the assertion that disk drive MTBF has a strong, nonlinear dependency on operating temperature. While I have not run disks at out of spec temperatures, I did work at Seagate for a few years, where I learned of this very strong dependence. This thread began with the assertion that you do not need to cool disks, but I think this is a very ill-advised strategy. YMMV, Karen -- Karen Shaeffer Neuralscape, Palo Alto, Ca. 94306 shaeffer at neuralscape.com http://www.neuralscape.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cooling vs HW replacement
- Next message: another radical concept...Re: [Beowulf] Cooling vs HW replacement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
