[Beowulf] PVFS or NFS in a Beowulf cluster?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kumaran Rajaram kums at VerariSoft.ComMon Jan 17 07:49:58 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] PVFS or NFS in a Beowulf cluster?
- Next message: [Beowulf] PVFS or NFS in a Beowulf cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I would suggest PVFS2. It offers greater bandwidth (proportional to number of I/O nodes dedicated) compared to NFS. Also, you may use PVFS2 native file interface (rather than POSIX I/O interface) which offers flexible parallel I/O interface for scientific workloads. Only caveat, is fault-tolerance support and you might need to employ either software/hardware RAID for disk failures and heartbeat mechanism for server failures. If the environment has less probability of server/disk/netowrk faults, then PVFS2 is a good choice for scientific workloads and parallel applications. -Kums On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Stavros E. Zogas wrote: > Hi at all > I intend to setup a beowulf cluster(16+ nodes) for scientific > applications(fortran compilers) in a University department.What am i supposd > to use???PVFS or NFS for file system?? > Stavros >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] PVFS or NFS in a Beowulf cluster?
- Next message: [Beowulf] PVFS or NFS in a Beowulf cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
