[Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joachim Worringen joachim at ccrl-nece.deTue Feb 15 01:47:32 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrick Geoffray wrote: > For your curiosity, it was using an in-house MPI Pingpong (one message > at a time, not a bogus pipelined pingpong used to confuse people and > make big pipes look good). For very small messages, most of Pingpong > codes are similar, ...but not equal and give different results. Just compare PMB and mpptest. > compiler has no impact (it was using the gcc that was > installed on the machine at that time). I experienced differences of more than 2 us depending on whether using shared or static libraries, compiler version/options etc. on both scalar and vector machines. > For asymptotic bandwidth, the > major difference is the way you compute 1 MB, either 1024*1024 Bytes, or > 1000000 Bytes. In the networking world, it tends to be 1000000 Bytes. I tend to use MB for 10^6 and MiB for 2^10. This is a somewhat official no Joachim -- Joachim Worringen - NEC C&C research lab St.Augustin fon +49-2241-9252.20 - fax .99 - http://www.ccrl-nece.de
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
