[Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comFri Feb 11 13:21:38 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:39:29PM -0600, Isaac Dooley wrote: > Using MPI_ISend() allows programs to not waste > CPU cycles waiting on the completion of a message transaction. This is > critical for some tightly coupled fine grained applications. We do pretty much the same thing for MPI_Send and MPI_ISend for small packets: they're nearly on the wire when the routine returns, and the subsequent MPI_Wait is a no-op. This is actually pretty common among MPI implementations. The problem with trying to generalize about what MPI calls do is that different implementations do different things with them. Reading the standard won't teach you much about implementations. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
