[Beowulf] mpich future
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
rene rene at renestorm.deMon Feb 7 15:37:05 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Newbie question on mpich2 installation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Rob, > The MQbench project does look interesting. Sort of a GUI version of > SkaMPI? It's something like the Pallas benchmark. But there aren't all Mpi Calls implemented yet. But its nice to choose a bunch of nodes and then a second one in the same application and see the differences. Its ordinary C mpi surrounded by a C++ Qt gui. > If you write an MPI program, it should work with all MPI implementations > (modulo missing MPI-2 features). It will not necessarily cleanly link > with any arbitrary library, in the same way that a C program will not > dynamically link with any arbitrary C library. > > So there is always going to be an issue of recompilation; is that your > second concern? Yes it is. Its probably possible to make software packages available for common linux distributions. But if you have to consider several mpi implementations extra, that could be lot of packages. I've you have written a major application like ls-dyna you can say: Take these linux, these compiler and this mpi and you get our compiled version, but nobody will alter their cluster for an add-on program like a mpi-copy tool. So the only choice is to go opensource. But in some areas it is important that (small or large) companies make professional, supported software available. But this isn't easy with mpi. Regards, Rene
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Newbie question on mpich2 installation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
