[Beowulf] cluster for doing real time video panoramas?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govThu Dec 22 18:28:34 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cluster for doing real time video panoramas?
- Next message: [Beowulf] cluster for doing real time video panoramas?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 04:20 PM 12/22/2005, Glen Gardner wrote: >Be bold. Do the image processing in parallel. Yes, but how to parallelize?? Do the projections to the sphere 1 or 2 cams per pc, and then "gather" the pieces of the projections? Or, send all cams to all pcs, and do frame parallel processing. Some sync issues there. A lot of interesting questions arise.. Just for grins.. 640x480x3 bytes per frame at 30fps = 27 MB/sec = 220 Mbit/sec That's a bunch o data to be pushing around. >It is the kind of thing that will run very fast on low end cpus >and it won't be a difficult job to parallelize. > >Glen > >On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 12:00 -0800, Jim Lux wrote: > > OK all you cluster fiends.. I've got a cool application (for home, sadly, > > not for work where I'd get paid to fool with it).. > > > > I've got a robot on which I want to put a half dozen or so video cameras > > (video in that they capture a stream of images, but not necessarily that > > put out analog video..) with overlapping fields of view. I've also got > > some telemetry that tells me what the orientation of the robot is. I want > > to take the video streams and stitch them (in near real time) into a > > spherical panorama, that I can then render from a corrected viewpoint > > (based on orientation) to "stabilize" the image. > > > > So.. you can get cheap 1394 video cameras from a variety of sources. > > There's a package of tools for doing the panoramas called panotools from > > Helmut Dersch, which I've used successfully with still frames (but not > > video!) that can do all the needed camera transformations and > resampling (I > > think). > > > > But, then, how do you do the real work... should the camera recalibration > > be done all on one processor? Should each camera (or pair) gets its own > > cpu, which builds that part of the overall spherical image, and hands them > > off to yet another processor which "looks" at the appropriate part of the > > video image and sends that to the user? > > > > here's an example of someone who did video panoramas on a Mac (but not in > > real time, I suspect) > > http://www.vrhotwires.com/InexpensivePanoramicVideo.html > > > > Panotools info at: > > http://www.panotools.info/mediawiki/index.php?title=Main_Page > > > > > > James Lux, P.E. > > Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group > > Flight Communications Systems Section > > Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213 > > 4800 Oak Grove Drive > > Pasadena CA 91109 > > tel: (818)354-2075 > > fax: (818)393-6875 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf James Lux, P.E. Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group Flight Communications Systems Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena CA 91109 tel: (818)354-2075 fax: (818)393-6875
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cluster for doing real time video panoramas?
- Next message: [Beowulf] cluster for doing real time video panoramas?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
