[Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduWed Dec 21 11:10:09 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, John Hearns wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:52 -0800, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>> Our artificial-stupidity "pathopt" utility can do a pretty good job of
>> magically finding the right compiler flags, but it's not that fast at
>> producing the answer.
> Well, you need to run it on one of these Beowulf clusters to make it faster.
Naaaa, you just need to recursively recompile the pathopt utility with
pathopt a few times until it converges as really really fast...;-)
rgb
--
Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/
Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
