[Beowulf] Looking for NFS Server performance comparison
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joachim Worringen joachim at ccrl-nece.deFri Dec 16 08:35:10 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Looking for NFS Server performance comparison
- Next message: [Beowulf] Looking for NFS Server performance comparison
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bill Rankin wrote: > Hi Gang, > > This may be a rehash, but I'm looking for any references to papers that > address the issue of NFS server scalability in a cluster environment. > Our current cluster here at Duke is right at 500 nodes (and growing) > and the single NFS server with attached SCSI drives serving all data to > all nodes just doesn't seem to hack it anymore. > > I know that there are clustered solutions like PVFS, IBRIX, et. al. as > well as the dedicated filer approach (NetApp, EMC, etc.) and we are > looking at those. But first we need to convince the powers that be that > a Linux-based NFS server just ain't going to cut it as we move forward. Hi Bill, sorry if this sounds a bit perky, but: if you have I/O bound applications, I'm quite sure you can show that they don't scale even with the current 500 nodes on a single NFS server. And if you don't have such applications - well, than you don't have a problem... ;-) You can still use a benchmark, but this might not convince "the powers". Above you say that the NFS server has already problems now: shouldn't that convince the powers that you need something else than NFS? Which problems do you refer to with "doesn't hack it anymore"? Correct me if I just didn't understand your problem. However, I *do* understand that NFS really is a bad idea for many nodes doing something else than just loading the executable (and even this may show problems at scale). Ie. doing MPI-IO correctly is a nightmare on NFS. > So if anyone knows of good documents (white papers, conference papers, > etc.) that will support my assertion, I would appreciate a pointer to > them. I'm quite sure the vendors will happily provide you with such material... A quick search gave this GPFS vs. NFS evaluation: http://www.nus.edu.sg/comcen/svu/publications/hpc_nus/sep_2005/Performance.pdf Joachim -- Joachim Worringen - NEC C&C research lab St.Augustin fon +49-2241-9252.20 - fax .99 - http://www.ccrl-nece.de
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Looking for NFS Server performance comparison
- Next message: [Beowulf] Looking for NFS Server performance comparison
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
