[Beowulf] Customize Comparison between Torque(PBS)/SGE and LSF
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rayson Ho raysonlogin at gmail.comFri Aug 5 20:25:54 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Customize Comparison between Torque(PBS)/SGE and LSF
- Next message: [Beowulf] channel bonding
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 8/4/05, Sebastian <ChiefShadow at gmx.de> wrote: > SGE: > + GUI > + Support (Mailing List) > + all demands are meet > + LAM-Support with Reutis Howto > + Basics for Checkpointing/Migration are available > + OpenSource Gridengine supports checkpoint/migrate, but you may need to configure a ckpt interface. It may involve some scripting to do to invoke external commands to do checkpointing (if any provided by LS-DYNA?). http://gridengine.sunsource.net/nonav/source/browse/~checkout~/gridengine/doc/htmlman/htmlman1/sge_ckpt.html You can get commerical support from: http://www.sun.com/software/gridware/partners/index.xml Webinterfaces are also available... in fact there are 4 or 5 written: - the simplest one is the GE momitor: http://www.veus.hr/php/gemonitor/ - or this one with XML->html: http://scripps.bos.bioteam.net/xml-qstat/ - or http://gridengine.sunsource.net/gep/GEP_Intro.html - and there's one from the Rocks cluster guys > Torque: > + Integration Torque and LAM/MPI with the tm-Modul > > - requirements only available with MAUI Scheduler > - no GUI when using MAUI (is that right??) > - xpbs&xpbsmon isn't good looking Maui is supposed to be the most advanced scheduler, with backfilling and advanced reservation... But with the size of the cluster, I am not sure if it's needed or not... and in fact, Maui+Torque is slower than SGE in terms of throughtput: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DC/0506006 >From page 7 of the paper: SGE TORQUE TORQUE+MAUI OAR OAR(2) Available Processors 34 34 34 34 34 Jobmix work (CPU-sec) 443340 443340 443340 443340 443340 Elapsed Time 14164 14818 15115 15264 14037 Efficiency 0,9206 0,8800 0,8627 0,8543 0.9289 This is kind of expected, since [SGE and Torque] "all the jobs requiring few processors are scheduled first while all the big parallel jobs are delayed until the end of the schedule." Rayson > > This is actually my small list with advantages/disadvantes, are there some > wrong or are there some missing? > > I read of some problems with PBS when you submit more than hundret jobs the > same time, because i think we don't have more than 20 jobs in a queue this > shouldn't be problematical. > > Now i listen what you will tell me and i'm amused of many answers. > > Thx and Kind Regards, > > Sebastian > > -- > GMX DSL = Maximale Leistung zum minimalen Preis! > 2000 MB nur 2,99, Flatrate ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Customize Comparison between Torque(PBS)/SGE and LSF
- Next message: [Beowulf] channel bonding
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
