[Beowulf] Cluster for Finite Element Analysis
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Toon Knapen toon.knapen at fft.beMon Apr 25 03:17:27 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cluster for Finite Element Analysis
- Next message: [Beowulf] Upgrading to gigabit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote: <snip> > >> 2. What type of cluster should I select for FEA ? >> >> > If you are using either a commercial package or writing your > own, network bandwidth it likely to be a bottleneck. So something > like Myrinet, IB, Quadrics, Dolphin, etc. are good choices. If > these are too expensive, then GigE is the way to go. > For commerical apps, you're going to need lots of IO in > the nodes. As Jeffrey mentions later in his mail, the solver is the most important part. So before answering the questions to the point, we actually need to know the type of solvers you are envisioning. Direct solvers will generally have to run out-of-core so disk-io is indeed important. To maximise the block-size of the out-of-core solver, memory is also important. The switch is less important in this case In My Experience. Iterative solvers OTOH have a smaller memory footprint. The switch is a little more important as compared with direct solvers IME. And if you're using explicit solvers (which are hopefully not out-of-core ;-), disk-io is not important but a fast processor is. And probably a fast interconnect will be important. <snip> toon -- Check out our training program on acoustics and register on-line at http://www.fft.be/?id=35
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cluster for Finite Element Analysis
- Next message: [Beowulf] Upgrading to gigabit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
