[Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comMon Apr 4 19:44:55 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Next message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:06:52PM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote: > The only way RH could > avoid it is to either run a twinned kernel configuration with the change > backed off or to freeze on a legacy kernel, both of which are such > stellarly bad ideas that I hope there is no need to even discuss them. I thought 4k stacks was a kernel *option*, and that 8k stacks are still expected to work. Certainly lots of websites advocated rebuilding your kernel with 8k stacks as a workaround to busted drivers. So no, it isn't as dire as you make it out to be. By the way, one legit reason to be disturbed by FC-X is that Red Hat simply doesn't fix broken stuff. I opened 3 bugzilla bugs for FC-1; one example is that xpdf was misconfigured and so unusual fonts didn't work right. All 3 were closed with "Fixed in FC-2". This is not good support, but then again Red Hat didn't promise much in Fedora. And I learned to avoid wasting my time filing bugs against Fedora, so we all won. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Next message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
