[Beowulf] Racing kernels
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Fringe Dweller steve_heaton at ozemail.com.auMon Apr 4 01:04:55 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPI questions
- Next message: [Beowulf] Racing kernels
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
G'day all.
Is anyone out there running a "racing" kernel on their nodes?
By "racing" I mean removing all unnecessary components (SCSI, USB et
al), tweaked buffer values, pre-empting, stripped, helium filled,
brushed aluminum etc?
Yes, it's a loaded question. I'm contemplating performance tweaking when
I realized that there's a bucket load of stuff in the default kernel
config I don't need.
Now anyone that's ever been exposed to that strange subspecies known as
"overclockers" knows you can go to ridiculous lengths ("Duuude, it's
fully sick, I can get another 2.3MHz if I take the box outside and hit
it with a hose").
I'd like to think we're giving priority to stability. But still... I
think there's scope for "safe" improvement?
Also need to include the type of target app(s) I s'pose. My Nbody apps
are smokin' math stuff but the IO is quite light. So there'd be a fair
range of variation in "optimal" config I'd imagine.
Thoughts appreciated.
Cheers
Steve
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPI questions
- Next message: [Beowulf] Racing kernels
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
