[Beowulf] x86-64 NUMA vs SMP kernel: appl. performance?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduMon Sep 27 07:46:50 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] BPROC patch 4.0.0pre4
- Next message: [Beowulf] x86-64 NUMA vs SMP kernel: appl. performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> It looks like Bill covered most of the questions, but I'll clean up a
> loose end:
Thanks Bill and Greg;
I'm getting ready to download a 30 day trial version myself. We have a
small stack of dual opterons in constant production in our department
(and will be getting a lot more, I'm sure). If the compiler makes my
code run 30% faster, that's like getting a cluster that is 30% larger
for the cost of the compiler, which appears to be a lot less than the
nodes themselves would cost (depending on how it is licensed).
rgb
Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/
Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] BPROC patch 4.0.0pre4
- Next message: [Beowulf] x86-64 NUMA vs SMP kernel: appl. performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
