COTS was Re: [Beowulf] 96 Processors Under Your Desktop
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comWed Sep 1 13:15:42 PDT 2004
- Previous message: COTS was Re: [Beowulf] 96 Processors Under Your Desktop
- Next message: COTS was Re: [Beowulf] 96 Processors Under Your Desktop
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 12:41:24PM -0700, Jim Lux wrote: > "requires time and expertise to set up" is of course what makes clusters (as > a completed system) not COTS, even though the components or subassemblies > may be COTS. I learn a new definition of COTS every day. I hadn't seen this one before. I suppose all the parents struggling to assemble toys on Xmas eve can console themselves that the mass-market item they bought at Wal-Mart isn't COTS... -- greg
- Previous message: COTS was Re: [Beowulf] 96 Processors Under Your Desktop
- Next message: COTS was Re: [Beowulf] 96 Processors Under Your Desktop
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
