[Beowulf] Intel 64bit (emt) Fortran code and AMD Opteron
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comThu Oct 28 13:28:35 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Intel 64bit (emt) Fortran code and AMD Opteron
- Next message: [Beowulf] Intel 64bit (emt) Fortran code and AMD Opteron
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 01:39:52PM -0600, Craig Tierney wrote: > However, for most applications the vectorization > is going to give you the big win. People think that, but did you know that SIMD vectorization doesn't help any of the codes in SPECfp? Remember that the Opteron can use both fp pipes with scalar code. This is very different from the Pentium4. I'd say this myth is the #1 myth in the HPC industry right now. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Intel 64bit (emt) Fortran code and AMD Opteron
- Next message: [Beowulf] Intel 64bit (emt) Fortran code and AMD Opteron
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
