[Beowulf] dual Opteron recommendations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caFri Oct 22 09:41:12 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] dual Opteron recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] dual Opteron recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Oh, speaking of which the main advantage I've seen in the newisys is > the remote managability. You can ssh to the management interface, check > temperatures, turn the machine on/off, and other related functionality. this is not newisis-specific, of course! we've got a cluster of HP DL145's (which look a LOT like Celestica a2210's). they have a nice lan-enabled IPMI card, which you can telnet to or use the reasonably secure IPMItools. HP certainly has ssh on other of their products (switches, for instance), so I'd expect them to add ssh support everywhere. > Alas, as far as I can tell the passthru for the management interface > (it has 2 ethernet ports for the management) isn't usable in any sane way. ipmitools seem to work nicely. I've got an perl/expect script for dealing with the telnet interface, if anyone wants it. > The idea of not requiring a masterswitch+ for power management, a > cyclades or similar for serial management, or a switch for a seperate decent IPMI support obsoletes all that junk. the DL145 gives you working bios redirection, as well as power control, warm/cold reset, lm_sensors-type data, etc. we're requiring this kind of remote management in all future purposes, and I'm convinced everyone doing clusters should do so as well. regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] dual Opteron recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] dual Opteron recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
