[Beowulf] SATA vs SCSI drives
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joshua Baker-LePain jlb17 at duke.eduMon Oct 11 06:06:18 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA vs SCSI drives
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA vs SCSI drives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 at 7:44pm, George Georgalis wrote > On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 12:01:37PM -0400, H.Vidal, Jr. wrote: > >Which SATA drives are considered 'the best' the way, say Seagate drives are > >held in high esteem for SCSI? > > > >And, if anybody likes any particular RAID and/or NAS system, let's hear > >your stories. About 1.4-1.7 Terabyte raw space. > > I've heard these are a good value > http://www.winsys.com/products/flata.php > > If you build your own, the 3com controllers can be had under $400 and are ^^^^ I think you meant "3ware" there... > said to be quite good. I'm booting SATA with a $35 addonics controller on > a workstation -- which I consider as reliable, faster and cheaper than > ATA. But that setup wasn't without difficulty setting up. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA vs SCSI drives
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA vs SCSI drives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
