[Beowulf] SATA vs SCSI drives
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
George Georgalis george at galis.orgSun Oct 10 16:44:14 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA vs SCSI drives
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA vs SCSI drives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 12:01:37PM -0400, H.Vidal, Jr. wrote: >Which SATA drives are considered 'the best' the way, say Seagate drives are >held in high esteem for SCSI? > >And, if anybody likes any particular RAID and/or NAS system, let's hear >your stories. About 1.4-1.7 Terabyte raw space. I've heard these are a good value http://www.winsys.com/products/flata.php If you build your own, the 3com controllers can be had under $400 and are said to be quite good. I'm booting SATA with a $35 addonics controller on a workstation -- which I consider as reliable, faster and cheaper than ATA. But that setup wasn't without difficulty setting up. // George -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator Linux BSD IXOYE http://galis.org/george/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george at galis.org
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA vs SCSI drives
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA vs SCSI drives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
