[Beowulf] Application Deployment
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caSun Oct 10 08:55:54 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Application Deployment
- Next message: [Beowulf] Application Deployment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> require training, expertise, etc. Sure, for Linux, the actual software is > free, but that's a small fraction of the $100K/yr you're paying to folks to > use the software. very interesting. one structural disadvantage that the windows ecosystem does labor under is that it must stick to the OS-really-installed-on-desktop model. that is, msft is not quite ready to go to a ephemeral-client model, where desktops just PXE-boot and mount everything of consequence across the net. (not just thin-client, where clients are all hard-installed, but use only a thin app like a browser for whatever the user needs.) with lan-ipmi and pxe, it's almost reasonable to claim that support doesn't scale with increasing nodes. there are still costs that scale with number of users, number of apps. hardware maintenance always scales with number of moving parts, but for ephemeral clients, it's far easier to have spares. the infrastructure to support 1K clients all booting monday morning would be nontrivial, but very tractable. no doubt the lack of nazi DRM (uncontrolled and dangerous network!) is why the msft community hasn't taken this approach.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Application Deployment
- Next message: [Beowulf] Application Deployment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
