[Beowulf] OT: effective amount of data through gigabit ether?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Sean Dilda agrajag at dragaera.netMon Oct 4 14:23:05 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OT: effective amount of data through gigabit ether?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Call for Participation - LCSC and NGN
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 16:40, Mike wrote: > I know this is off topic, but I've not found an answer anywhere. > On one IBM doc it says the effective throughput for 10Mb/s is > 5.7GB/hour, 100Mb/s is 17.6GB/hour, but only lists TBD for 1000MB/s. > Does anyone know what this effective number is? This is for > calculating how long backups should take through my backup network. > Those are interesting numbers. I calculate the peak numbers to be: 10MB/s - 4.19GB/hour (less than your IBM number) 100MB/s - 41.9GB/hour (way more than your IBM number) 1000MB/s - 419GB/hour In reality, the answer depends on your hardware. With my setup I've pushed 114MB/s over gigabit for an excess of ten minutes, which tends to average out all the bursts. If I took that out, it'd come to about 400GB/hour. > (I'm not interested in how long it takes to read/write the disk, > just the network throughput.) See now, that's the trick. Gigabit maxes out around 119MB/s. I've not tended to see disks that can actually preform that well (maybe with sequential data, but not with random data).
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OT: effective amount of data through gigabit ether?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Call for Participation - LCSC and NGN
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
