[Beowulf] Register article on Opteron - disagree
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Karen Shaeffer shaeffer at neuralscape.comSun Nov 21 22:56:58 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Register article on Opteron - disagree
- Next message: [Beowulf] Register article on Opteron - disagree
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:57:35AM -0500, Joe Landman wrote: > > EM64t uses the same northbridge/southbridge design as the Xeon. This > means that multiprocessors are going to be not very good in SMP > performance, just like the Xeon's (and I am sure some folks will > disagree, but I am thinking of memory bandwidth hungry apps). The > chipset is the bottleneck. > > I am not sure what impact Nocona will have. I reserve judgement until > I get to see one/play with one, and see its future path. Lots of > interesting conversations were had at SC. The quote from Mark Twain may > be apt. If a Nocona follow-on follows the design of the Opteron (IOMMU > and HT, among other things), then things could get quite interesting. > > > Joe Hi folks, These folks published some recent (workstation) data. http://www.hexus.net/content/reviews/review.php?dXJsX3Jldmlld19JRD04MjImdXJsX3BhZ2U9MQ== Thanks, Karen -- Karen Shaeffer Neuralscape, Palo Alto, Ca. 94306 shaeffer at neuralscape.com http://www.neuralscape.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Register article on Opteron - disagree
- Next message: [Beowulf] Register article on Opteron - disagree
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
