[Beowulf] Re: torus versus (fat) tree topologies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Steffen Persvold sp at scali.comSun Nov 21 09:44:28 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 10:45 -0700, Craig Tierney wrote: [] > > I don't have exact pricing for Infiniband but I wouldn't pay > more than $1000 per port for a complete system (card/cables/switches) > for a large system (requiring more than 1 switch). If vendor > A won't do it, just go ask vendor B. > Which is one of the nice things about InfiniBand, industry standard; more vendors more competition. Don't get me wrong, personally I like all the other interconnects also for their respective technological advantages. We should also begin to see multiple RNIC (RDMA over Ethernet) vendors in the HPTC interconnect market very soon. Regards, Steffen Persvold
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
