[Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Richard Walsh rbw at ahpcrc.orgTue Nov 16 11:19:03 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ashley Pittman wrote: >On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 17:51 -0500, Patrick Geoffray wrote: > > >>Going trough a crossbar cost about 100-150ns these days. >> >> > >This isn't necessarily true, we reckon about 25ns on elan4. This >doesn't give you perfect latency scaling across very large networks but >it's very close. > >Ashley, > >_______________________________________________ >Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > > > Mmm ... from your 2003 Hot Chips presentation on Elan 4 I see 231 nanos. Which is right, or are we talking about two different things? Regards, rbw AHPCRC
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
