[Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comFri Nov 12 16:55:48 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 06:02:08PM -0500, Patrick Geoffray wrote: > How do you close your Torus without long cables ? Unless you stack your > nodes in a circle, you will need long cables. BlueGene's trick is to attach every other node to the end, and then come back with the unused ones. So: Nodes: 0 1 2 3 4 Connections: 0 -> 2 -> 4 -> 3 -> 1 -> 0 No long cable. This is probably a classic solution not invented by IBM. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
