[Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comFri Nov 12 15:02:08 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Håkon, Håkon Bugge wrote: > deployment times and more complicated node replacement. In larger > systems though, cabling of centralized switched tends to require very > _long_ cables, something you do not need using tori topologies. How do you close your Torus without long cables ? Unless you stack your nodes in a circle, you will need long cables. Patrick -- Patrick Geoffray Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list