[Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 9, Issue 12
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Håkon Bugge Hakon.Bugge at scali.comFri Nov 12 13:04:07 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 9, Issue 12
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 08:29 PM 11/12/04, Chris Sideroff wrote: > As a side note, since my original post about this the Nov 2004 Top500 >has come out. I did not realize the dominance that myrinet has on the >list - #1 with 38.6% share - while no other proprietary high-speed >interconnect is even close. I know of systems on previous lists which are listed as Myrinet systems, but are actually only running Gbe. This might stem from the fact that some vendors would like to get as many system listed as possible. When they have benchmarked and submitted an N-node cluster with Myrinet, it is very tempting to submit another N-node cluster using the same node hardware;-). * Hakon (Hakon.Bugge _ AT_ scali.com)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 9, Issue 12
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
