[Beowulf] PVFS on 80 proc (40 node) cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert Latham robl at mcs.anl.govMon Nov 1 08:46:44 PST 2004
- Next message: [Beowulf] PVFS on 80 proc (40 node) cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 10:14:44PM -0500, Brian Smith wrote: > PVFS2 has much improved fault tolerance over PVFS1 in that there can be > redundant file nodes where as with PVFS1, if one node dropped dead, your > FS was toast. Just wanted to point out that through shared storage, 'heartbeat', and engough hardware, you can have redundant PVFS1 and PVFS2 nodes. We do not at this time have *software* redundancy. It's an area of active research, though. Please don't let the lack of software redundancy scare you off! Many many sites have run PVFS and not found reliability to be a problem. Your application can do its I/O, writing out checkpoints or reading datafiles or whatever IO it does to PVFS. After your application runs, move the data to tape or long-term storage at your liesure. PVFS is fast scratch space, and as long as you treat it as such, everything should work just fine. > If you go to their web site, there should be plenty of documentation on > how to set it up. Yes. Also, feel free to take up this discussion on the PVFS mailing lists. ==rob -- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF Argonne National Labs, IL USA B29D F333 664A 4280 315B
- Next message: [Beowulf] PVFS on 80 proc (40 node) cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
